<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1970 Mustang With 1100 ci Sherman Tank Engine</title>
	<link>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/</link>
	<description>Your Source For Mustang News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 20:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-202974</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-202974</guid>
					<description>wow. looks like hes got great f/r weight distribution what with all that massive motor behind the front suspension. lol. whats the weight on that anyway, atleast how much more or less than a iron block 460 v8 is it? I would love to see a video of this. just add some equal length manifolds and f.i. and put two industrial size turbos on it(youll need it to make it rev past 3000, you know, to 3500 or 4000), then lemme drive it so i can die happily of a heart attack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. looks like hes got great f/r weight distribution what with all that massive motor behind the front suspension. lol. whats the weight on that anyway, atleast how much more or less than a iron block 460 v8 is it? I would love to see a video of this. just add some equal length manifolds and f.i. and put two industrial size turbos on it(youll need it to make it rev past 3000, you know, to 3500 or 4000), then lemme drive it so i can die happily of a heart attack
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Esandes</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-185386</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-185386</guid>
					<description>Resandes! :rolleyes:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Resandes! :rolleyes:
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-185344</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-185344</guid>
					<description>:hanniballs:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:hanniballs:
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Glenn Moller</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-185305</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-185305</guid>
					<description>Idiotic.  Looks retarded and is completely uselss.  Get a V6 then we'll talk.  Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idiotic.  Looks retarded and is completely uselss.  Get a V6 then we&#8217;ll talk.  Peace.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: I am with stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-185210</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-185210</guid>
					<description>Paul you are an idiot...  the point is that someone did something unique not that you hate Ford.  Don't have kids they won't make it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul you are an idiot&#8230;  the point is that someone did something unique not that you hate Ford.  Don&#8217;t have kids they won&#8217;t make it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-184957</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-184957</guid>
					<description>You can spend all the MONEY you want on a Ford, but in the end, IT'S STILL JUST A FORD! Not impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can spend all the MONEY you want on a Ford, but in the end, IT&#8217;S STILL JUST A FORD! Not impressed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-174961</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-174961</guid>
					<description>Look like oneofthem hotwheel cars, really, all it needs now is a blower...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look like oneofthem hotwheel cars, really, all it needs now is a blower&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: decipha</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-161422</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 03:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-161422</guid>
					<description>very nice, thats something i would do if i had the means of coming across an engine like that

any1 know the power limits of these blocks? im sure its got to be in the ten thousands</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice, thats something i would do if i had the means of coming across an engine like that</p>
<p>any1 know the power limits of these blocks? im sure its got to be in the ten thousands
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: my406cid80fbe</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-144322</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-144322</guid>
					<description>It seems that Ford needed a BIGGER motor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that Ford needed a BIGGER motor!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: quickvic</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-141993</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2007/70-mustang-with-1100-ci-sherman-tank-engine/#comment-141993</guid>
					<description>HOLY SHIT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOLY SHIT
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
